Fun in Florida – PMA’s Annual Meeting

September 10th, 2010 by Gretchen Zierick

It’s time to make your travel plans and sign up for PMA’s Annual Meeting, taking place October 7 – 9 at the Amelia Island Plantation in Florida.  Okay, you’re thinking, why should I attend?

If you know Art (PMA’s First Gent) and me at all, you know we always look for outdoor activities when we attend any PMA event.  And since this is our meeting, we’ve planned lots of them.  There’s a day trip to Cumberland Island, an afternoon of horseback riding, bird watching, golf (a PMA requirement), and kayaking.  The resort rents bikes and Segways, with miles of paths to explore.  It should be easy to fill every minute of free time.

But this is a business trip, you say.  Yes, and we’ve got great speakers and a solid list of roundtable subjects.   We’ve got a super economist – Jeff Thredgold –  to talk about what’s happening post-recession.  Dr. Yaron Brook will talk to my theme – the Morality of Manufacturing.  I’ve watched him on TV and listened to some of his taped lectures, and am very excited to welcome him to our meeting.  We also have Jay Rifenbary as our “inspirational” speaker, to send us all away with a sense that we can all be better at what we do.

Our roundtables have something for everyone.  Politics, raw-material issues, OSHA concerns, labor law and more.  You can talk to Dr. Brook about the morality of making money, come talk to PMA leadership about our plans for the future or, if you’re female, join the Women in Metalforming business discussion.

There also are numerous opportunities for networking, from the Welcoming Reception on Wednesday to the Theme Dinner and Annual Banquet, where I will hand over the gavel to Bob Clay, our 2011 Chair.  There also is the chance to network with NTMA members, since this is a joint meeting.

I’ve given you a business justification for a wonderful getaway.  Please join us–I’m looking forward to seeing old friends and meeting new ones!

Should You Need to Know Your Company’s Carbon Footprint?

September 7th, 2010 by Brad Kuvin

In my September issue editorial, I note that the move to electric vehicles has led to OEM directives for a greener supply chain.

“Leading the pack is Ford,” I wrote, “which recently asked 35 of its top global suppliers for energy-use and greenhouse-gas emissions data. …Odds are that someday soon the greening of the supply chain will impact lower Tier suppliers.  Do you know your company’s carbon footprint? Better get ready to answer that question!”

The following is a Letter to the Editor reply, repurposed here with permission, from John Berney, president of Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC, Lapper, MI. The company fabricates tubing for applications ranging from ¼-in. brake lines to 6-in.-dia. truck exhaust systems.

“It is amazing to me that you jump on the bandwagon of suppliers needing to measure carbon footprint…(All that this does is) add cost to each company’s bottom line.…The big three has beat this into their supply base for the past 25 years; we need to look at value-added costs, not “do good feelings.”

How much longer will our government subsidize this green movement? What happens when the Tea Party people take over parts of our government and they turn back some of these EPA mandates? (Do we really want) the next generation stuck with these mandates that can’t be sustained? …Do you think that the next generation won’t undo what the EPA has done?

When we fail to look at causes and effects, we are doomed. The light bulb is a perfect example–we mandate compact fluorescent bulbs, yet we don’t manufacture them here. Why didn’t anyone think to have our manufacturers retool before we passed legislation? Why did we not discuss the impact to our manufacturing base, and why don’t we pass laws that support U.S. manufacturing?

Light bulbs are a good example of the green movement gone bad. We need to step back and take a breath before just going along.”

John and I welcome your input.

Like Tube Bending?

September 1st, 2010 by Brad Kuvin

OK, I’ll keep this short and sweet.

Want to see the coolest CNC tube-bending video ever? Follow this link. While the machine’s been around for a few years, I’ve never actually seen one in operation, until now. Mighty cool.

PMA Annual Meeting: Something Old, Something New – All Good

August 24th, 2010 by Dave Sansone

We’re all gearing up for PMA’s 2010 Annual Meeting at Amelia Island, FL, October 7-9, 2010. It will include all of the great things attendees expect: great keynote speakers, on-target roundtables, and unparalleled peer networking, all at a simply beautiful location.

And if you’ve clicked on all of those links, I’m sure you noticed something new. This year we’ll be joined onsite by the National Tooling and Machining Association (NTMA), holding its Fall Conference at the same time and location. This provides an opportunity to meet new friends and to network with a greater number of like-minded peers at sessions common to both organizations, while allowing for some PMA-only events to strengthen your ties with old friends and help the organization move forward.

Registration is open. If you’ve been a past attendee, we’ll be prepared to welcome you back. If you’ve not attended an Annual Meeting before, this is a great opportunity to start a new tradition.

The U.S. Manufacturing Policy—
All Fiddling, No Firefighting

August 20th, 2010 by Brad Kuvin

I just read where the government is ready to issue a national manufacturing policy, to promote industrial activity in all parts of the country. Encouraging the manufacturing sector, it’s been said, is necessary to increase its share in the GDP and attract investment.  Also stressed is the need for skills development, to take advantage of the global shortage of trained workforce.

Looking more into the development of a manufacturing policy, I read how such a policy will encourage businesses to “develop their products and manufacturing processes, while improving their skills, in order to remain competitive in new markets. At the same time, they must also find new opportunities resulting from technological developments and globalization. Encouraging adaptability and structural change to sustain manufacturing competitiveness is essential, especially in the light of increasingly strong competition from emerging economies.”

Important declarations, both, but neither, unfortunately, have anything to do with the United States. Rather, the first paragraph came from an announcement made by the Indian government several months ago. Yes, India now has a manufacturing policy aimed at “attracting overseas investment and promoting industrial activity in all parts of the country,” according to an article in The Economic Times.

The second well-crafted statement? That one comes from the European Industrial Policy, developed by the European Commission nearly 5 years ago.

So where the heck is the U.S. manufacturing policy that has been discussed, hashed out and talked about over and over for more than a year now. The hubbub started when we proudly announced our government’s new senior counselor for manufacturing policy—yes, the Manufacturing Czar. That boasted-about government position was supposed to “steer U.S. manufacturing policy.”

Personally, all I see from Washington is a little meat and no bones, the latest dish arriving a few days ago when President Obama visited my fair city of Cleveland. That visit prompted Ohio junior U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown to write an op-ed piece for the Cleveland Plain Dealer (August 17, 2010). Says Brown:

“Our status as an economic superpower…is at risk of slipping away unless we develop a coherent manufacturing strategy. Such a strategy must promote innovation, supply chains, skills and fair trade.”

Is it me, or is this the same line we’ve been getting from our politicians for months and months now, our elected leaders who preach that they’ve got manufacturing’s back?  Seems to me that we’ve allowed our country’s manufacturing sector—the one-time global manufacturing leaders–to be left fiddling while Rome burns.

Can we please have a moratorium on these op-ed pieces loaded with rhetoric until there’s truly something to talk about—an American Manufacturing Policy!

By the way, if you want to know what Senator Brown wrote in the Plain Dealer piece, just take a look at his editorial published on Manufacturing.net—from July 17, 2009.  Yes, the same information just repurposed more than 12 months later.

The lights are on, the cameras are rolling. Can we please have some action?